With so much evidence supporting the flat Earth theory, why aren't more resources dedicated to studying it?
08.06.2025 12:43
We have several hundred people who flew to space and saw it with their own eyes.
We have photos of the round earth taken by many hundreds of satellites - owned by many different governments AND by many companies AND (with “cubesats”) by kids in college.
This is direct evidence. No complicated thinking-about-it things to worry your tiny brains.
What discoveries in AI research have changed our understanding of intelligence evolution?
To pick just two things:
No Flat Earther has EVER explained the motion of the Sun and Moon around their flat earth model that can explain sunrise and sunset times all around the world.
There’s a reason for that - it is literally, mathematically and geometrically impossible to do that other than on a sphere.
'Strawberry Moon' 2025: June's full moon is about to break an annual record - Live Science
Just one person (like me) can provide at least two dozen disproofs of the Flat Earth - and at least another two dozen consequences that we’d EASILY be able to spot if the Earth was actually flat.
So - there you go. Two disproofs that no flat earther can explain.
Now - there is NO piece of so-called evidence that you can provide that I cannot disprove. Try it. Post a piece of so-called flat-earth evidence in comments below - and I can single-handedly disprove it.
Astronomers discover most powerful cosmic explosions since the Big Bang - Space
Your only defense against those claims is to yell “FAKE” or “CONSPIRACY”…but without any real reason why anyone would fake it - or what the conspiracists have to gain from this insanely difficult set of operations.
No Flat Earther has EVER explained how a simple magnetic compass works in the southern hemisphere (or the region beyond the equatorial circle in their own maps).
Because this “evidence” that you imagine simply doesn’t exist - and yet the amount of evidence (indeed PROOF) that it’s nonsense is an enormous mountain: